For years, the large diameter (defined as 16 in. and above) water pipe market has been represented by steel pipe (SP), precast concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP), ductile iron pipe (DIP), and PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pipe. HDPE pipe, on the other hand, comprises just 2 to 5% of the large diameter water pipe market.
This article will summarize the perception issues related to large diameter HDPE pipe as well as recommendations for pipe joining, fittings, specifications, design, installation, and maintenance.
According to the EPA report, the perception issues surrounding large diameter HDPE pipes come down to three main ideas. First, there is a general lack of knowledge about the product. In a municipality project, the number of stakeholders can complicate the transfer of knowledge about the product to get everyone on the same page. Similarly, workers generally feel more comfortable using familiar products and techniques. Finally, this lack of knowledge can even lead to the misconception that HDPE is unsuitable for water applications.
Even if some knowledge is available, the second perception issue is rooted in the idea that there is an increased risk associated with using novel materials. Users often see HDPE as a new product for their specific application, making it fall outside their comfort zone since there is no experience using it. A significant driver is needed to convince utilities to try new materials and applications. Interesting enough,
The best way to overcome these perception issues is to help quantify perceived risk and demonstrate the quantifiable benefits of using a new material. Additionally, it would be helpful to look at the history of similar products in use. For instance, gas utilities have been using polyethylene pipe since the mid-1960s.
While it is relatively easy to talk about the physical and chemical characteristics of HDPE pipe, a better way to help quantify its benefits is to describe its performance in relation to other piping materials. In a survey conducted with 17 utilities in the United Kingdom, researchers outline the average failure rate from various piping materials. The average failure rate per 62 miles ranged from 20.1 failures on the high end for iron pipes, down to 3.16 failures on the low end for PE pipes. Another interesting finding from this report is that some of the PE utilized in the pipes was manufactured more than 50 years ago.
Today, PE manufacturers can manufacture enhanced polymer structures to increase slow crack growth resistance, tensile strength, ductility, allowable hydrostatic stress, and other pipe material properties. The significance of these improvements cannot be overstated. A survey of utilities regarding their satisfaction with PE pipes changed drastically between 1980s and 2000s. While customer satisfaction hovered around 53% during the 1980s, by the 2000s customer satisfaction rose to 95%.
The primary reasons quoted for choosing HDPE piping materials for large diameter transmission mains include flexibility, fusible joints, corrosion resistance, compatibility with trenchless technology methods (e.g., horizontal directional drilling), and cost savings. Ultimately, these benefits were achieved when proper construction methods (especially fusion welding) were followed.